Contact Dulevo UK - TEL: 01924 820 876 |

Latest News From Dulevo

Antigua and Barbuda Seeks US Gambling Trade Dispute End

Antigua and Barbuda Seeks US Gambling Trade Dispute End

Gaston Brown, Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, who brought up the nation’s trade dispute with the US during the United Nations General Assembly month that is last. (Image:

Antigua and Barbuda, the tiny twin-island Caribbean country which has been involved in an online gambling trade dispute with america for the decade, would be to enter into speaks as the two edges seek to move towards an answer. The move follows a meeting involving the islands’ Prime Minister Gaston Browne and US Trade Representative Michael Froman.

The David and Goliath battle began when Antigua and Barbuda objected to the block imposed by the federal government on its citizens that are own using the islands’ online gambling solutions. An international treaty, drawn up by the WTO in 1995, which is designed to remove barriers to trade in 2003, Antigua and Barbuda complained to the World Trade Organization (WTO) that America’s stance contravened the General Agreement on Trades and Services ( GATS.

The result, which likely embarrassed the US and astonished probably even Antigua and Barbuda, was that the WTO sided utilizing the islands, ruling, in March 2004, and then again in 2007, that by refusing full market access to online gambling operators on the islands, the United States, a paid-up member regarding the WTO, was in breach of its treaty obligations.

$3.4 Billion in Trade Sanctions

Buoyed by its success, Antigua and Barbuda filed a claim for $3.4 billion in trade sanctions against the united states, within the kind of authorization to ignore US patent and the laws of copyright, arguing that this was the value of trade lost as a result associated with restriction of online gambling services between the two countries. This would potentially have allowed the hawaiian islands to ignore the intellectual property slots of vegas casino no deposit bonus codes november 2018 rights folks organizations, such as those in the movie and music industry, so that you can resell their assets.

The united states, which argued, and continues to do so, so it never intended its dedication to GATS to include on line gambling, offered different concessions that are undisclosed the islands rather than those demanded, but refused to make the nature of these concessions public, despite calls from Congressmen Barney Frank and Ron Paul to do so.

The situation remains unresolved,but still burns brightly in the minds the island’s citizens today. Simply last thirty days, Browne brought the matter up at the us General Assembly, where he called on the united states to settle the matter, a move that prompted the renewed talks. Both parties have now agreed to construct an united group to come together in the dispute.

‘we am encouraged that my administration has been able to secure a meeting with the US Trade Representative, Ambassador Froman, so early,’ said Browne. ‘Ambassador Froman is really a Cabinet-level officer of the United States Government and this should facilitate decision-making on policy issues.’

History of on line in Antigua and Barbuda

Antigua and Barbuda had been an adopter that is early of gambling, creating a framework for regulation as far back as 1994, whenever industry ended up being in its infancy. Low taxes and investment in tech infrastructure soon started operators that are drawing. By the year 2000, the islands had 93 online gambling licensees who were turning in $ 7 billion in income between them. This ended up being also around the time that the united states started breaking down on online gambling operators and barring banks from processing transactions, and thus the number of licensees begun to plunge, decimating the industry on the islands.

By 2002, the amount of operators had dropped to 38 and, by the the following year, when Antigua and Barbuda filed its complaint to your WTO, over 80 percent had left the island.

Trump Taj Mahal Protests Create Atlantic City Gridlock

24 people were arrested as Taj Mahal union workers protested reduced advantages near Carl Icahn’s Tropicana in Atlantic City. (Image: Ron Tarver/

Trump Taj Mahal workers reduced Atlantic City to gridlock this previous week, blocking roadways in protest against Trump Entertainment’s plans to cut retirement benefits and benefits. The company that is embattled looking for permission from a bankruptcy court to split contracts with workers in an attempt to keep the Taj Mahal available and prevent Chapter 11.

Twenty-four people were arrested as hundreds of members associated with Unite Here 54 union blocked traffic at the busy downtown intersection of Missouri and Arctic Avenues in a show of organized ‘civil disobedience.’

No one was reported injured during the protests and none of the protestors who had been arrested attempted to resist. While Unite Here said that 750 individuals attended the demonstration, authorities estimated the true numbers at around 300.

Trump Entertainment has stated it’s going to be forced to close the Taj on 13th unless the employment concessions are granted november. It can also be demanding $25 million in aid from local government, along with a significantly reduced tax assessment. Trump Entertainment has also requested permission become bought out by billionaire investor Carl Icahn, the holder that is major of financial obligation, by converting that debt into ownership. As owner, Icahn would invest $100 then million to keep the Taj alive, but that’s ‘if and only if’ the concessions are granted.

Protestors Blame Icahn

Significantly, the demonstrations occurred near the Tropicana, which is owned by Icahn, rather than the Taj, and it is clear that lots of employees blame him for the risk to their advantages; many held placards featuring pictures of Icahn, emblazoned using the motto, ‘Billionaire picking over our bones.’

This week’s protest took destination regarding the 10th anniversary of the comparable work dispute that saw people of Unite right Here 54 go out of seven Atlantic City gambling enterprises, effectively shutting them down for 30 days.

‘When they were rolling in money, they wanted to away take it all from us decade ago,’ said union president Bob McDevitt.

Workers are now actually concerned one casino cutting benefits could trigger a domino effect. ‘Casino gambling, when it came here 38 years back, promised middle-class jobs,’ said the Rev. John Scotland, A presbyterian that is local minister some of those arrested. ‘with them. if we allow the Taj to remove benefits, all the gambling enterprises will do away’

Trump Name Removed

Earlier in the week, the Trump title ended up being removed by workers from the front of the Taj. Donald Trump launched a lawsuit months that are several for breach of the licensing agreement he finalized with Trump Entertainment five years ago. Whilst the Taj Mahal, along with the recently shuttered Trump Plaza, had been as soon as one of ‘The Donald’s’ pet projects, he left the casino business in 2009, negotiating a deal with Trump Entertainment to retain a ten percent stake, in return for continued usage of the Trump brand. Subsequently he has had nothing at all to do with the management associated with the Trump properties, and contains been fiercely critical of its owners.

‘This represents a victory that is great us,’ said Ivanka Trump, who confirmed the elimination of the title from casino signage. ‘This happens to be an ongoing struggle and we’ve been litigating it for a few months.’

PPA’s John Pappas Makes Federal Ban Panorama Crystal Murky

John Pappas, PPA President, makes some patently unclear statements about their stand on a federal online ban. (Image: Bloomberg/

The Poker Players Alliance (PPA) will fight any legislation that seeks to ban gaming that is online a federal degree, even if it contains a carve-out for internet poker. That is the message from John Pappas, president of the grassroots organization that fights for the passions of Internet poker players through the entire United States.

Well, that is just what it seemed like Pappas ended up being saying, but a subsequent statement that is follow-up an interview made his views, shall we say, murky to state the least.

Pappas had been responding to a wide range of rumors circulating of the move to push through a federal bill to ban remote gaming with a carve-out for poker during Congress’ forthcoming lame duck session. Several panelists at the G2E that is recent gambling in Las Vegas repeated the rumors, including Bally Technologies CEO John Connelly, who said he expected an initiative to create ‘everything apart from poker illegal’ this November.

‘There’s undoubtedly opportunity for some shenanigans to happen [during the lame duck session] and everybody into the video gaming industry should be maintaining a close view on which Congress may do,’ warned Pappas. a duck that is lame relates to your period when Congress meets after elections have actually taken place, but before newly elected representatives’ terms begin.

Some posters on poker forums were alarmed at Pappas’ statement, seeing it as being a departure from the PPA’s reported goals. The PPA offered full support in 2012, when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) and Senator Jon Kyl (R-Arizona) were examining the viability of such a bill.

Federal Carve-out Acceptable, Or Is It?

However, Pappas later clarified his position. Sort of.

‘If there was a bill that banned on line casino games but legalized online poker at the federal level, we would support that all day long,’ he told Wait, don’t he say earlier that without casino games, online isn’t sustainable? We’re confused.

Pappas says he is concerned that a ‘carve-out’ for poker that would not legalize the game at a level that is federal merely represent a continuation of the status quo, whereby it might be as much as individual states to decide whether or not they wanted to legalize and manage, with the exception that online casino gambling would no longer be an option for them. On a state level, he claims, on-line poker needs the extra revenue provided by online casinos to gain a foothold.

‘We’re planning to fight tooth and nail to safeguard the interests of poker players, but poker-only in the US might not be described as a model that is sustainable benefit players, long-term,’ he explained. ‘We as a poker community need to recognize that the prosperity of poker often is created on other forms of gaming,’ he added. ‘ If you take off all other games in america market, investment and interest would shrink considerably.’

Like we said…huh?


It’s seems likely, too, that the PPA feels it has to stand strong, under its own terms, against Adelson and also the proponents of Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) to your bitter end. Just if RAWA is passed by Congress, the worst case scenario for the PPA, will it become required to engage in a spot of realpolitik and work to negotiate a carve-out for poker.

However, possibly a more threat that is real the PPA than the lame duck session may be the Republicans using throughout the Senate next year as predicted, therefore toppling online poker sympathizer Reid from his position as majority frontrunner. As a major donor to the Republicans, this would truly favor Adelson’s cause.