Contact Dulevo UK - TEL: 01924 820 876 |

Latest News From Dulevo

Day revel and Showboat Close in Atlantic City Over Labor

Day revel and Showboat Close in Atlantic City Over Labor

The Showboat and Revel Casinos in Atlantic City shut their doors for the final time over Labor Day weekend. (Image:

It was the finish of the road for Revel and Showboat this week-end once the two Atlantic City casinos shut their doorways for good. For casinos in this seaside resort town, Labor Day is usually a time that is celebratory of year. The traditional ‘end of summer’ in the us, the three-day weekend ought to be a booming time for this new Jersey gambling hub, as both gamblers and tourists can come to take pleasure from a three-day week-end and some beach weather that is great.

But also for these two casinos into the beleaguered city, this year’s Labor Day week-end marked the final curtain. The Showboat Casino ended a run that is 27-year Atlantic City on Sunday, while the Revel began their two-day shutdown on Monday. The 2 closures provides the amount of casinos in the city down to nine, a number that will drop to eight if the Trump Plaza resort closes later this month.

Showboat Closed Despite Remaining Successful

The Showboat Casino Hotel ended up being one of four casinos in Atlantic City owned by Caesars Entertainment (Bally’s Atlantic City, Caesars Atlantic City and Harrah’s Resort Atlantic City being the other three), and also for the company, which was just one too many within the shrinking market. They hope that closing one casino will benefit the remaining three. But that does not stay well with many employees, considering that the Showboat was still earning money right up to the day it closed.

‘we are all feeling a betrayed that is little’ said Curtis Wade, a cook at the Showboat. ‘today we’re all walking around in a fog. We worked really hard to keep it operating, so we’re still lucrative. We still do not understand why we were the one targeted to close, and nobody has given us a solution on that.’

Caesars CEO Gary Loveman tried to let employees know that their efforts over the years was indeed appreciated.

‘ I would like to thank the Showboat Atlantic City team for their dedication, professionalism, and commitment to our guests,’ Loveman wrote in a letter to employees.

Revel Never Found Formula for Success

Not long after the Showboat closed, the same procedure started at the Revel. On Monday, the Revel Casino Hotel began clearing down resort guests, with the casino set to shut down on Tuesday. The closure comes simply over two years following the resort that is upscale opened, and comes after two trips to bankruptcy court.

The Revel was built to attract travelers that are high-end would come for the number of amenities, including their casino. But that don’t seem to suit because of the Atlantic City market, additionally the Revel never made a revenue while it was in procedure. a total smoking ban and a not enough casino standards and promotions like a buffet or rewards club switched off prospective customers, therefore the owners didn’t have the advantage associated with large player databases that established casino companies can rely on.

‘Revel struggled with the execution of plans to produce their market, also making use of their design and just a basic comprehension of the Atlantic City visitor,’ stated Borgata Senior Vice President Joe Lupo.

Both Properties Looking for Purchasers

Both the Showboat and Revel continue to be looking for potential buyers. The Showboat is an older property, but given its history as a casino that is profitable it might find suitors if Caesars doesn’t limit the cap ability of the new customer to operate a casino there.

The revel comes with a lot of baggage on the other hand. In particular, a heating, cooling and electrical plant is a major expense, and purchasers are unsuccessful in their attempts to purchase the resort while maybe not using the power plant included in the deal.

Bahamas Considering On The Web Gambling, But Only for Tourists

A controversial iGaming bill now regarding the legislative table within the Bahamas could ban locals from playing. (Image:

The Bahamas could soon be the next island that is small to legalize on line gambling. If so, it will be the culmination of a bill that was proposed last might, and which now could be sent to the Bahamian House of Assembly when next week. But the bill is not without controversy, particularly over who will have access to your web sites it shall legalize.

The new law would allow only land-based casinos in the nation to offer online gambling; not unlike how the system is set up in US regulated states, interestingly in its current form. Differing from the American way, however, would be that the online gambling sites in the Bahamas would only have the ability to offer their games to tourists who had been visiting the united states from countries where they might also be legitimately allowed to play online; a double-whammy of confusion regardless of how you notice.

Discriminatory Language is Controversial

That has caught the ire of some Bahamian politicians, including MP Leslie Millar.

‘It will be extremely contentious and I will speak out hard if Bahamians are disadvantaged in favor of foreigners,’ Millar said.

The bill was designed in an effort to result in the law as restrictive as possible, stated Minister of State for Legal Affairs Damian Gomez once the bill was initially launched. That led to controversy, because did provisions regarding regulatory and taxation issues. Former Gaming Board Chairman, Dr. Andre Rollins, was even removed from his position last month, possibly because he’d expressed opposition to the bill.

The limitations on who be permitted to play in the internet sites may be considering comparable policies discovered in certain land-based jurisdictions, particularly in Asia. In nations like South Korea, most or all casinos just allow foreigners to gamble at brick-and-mortar casinos, hence allowing governments to enjoy at least a number of the financial advantages of hosting casinos while nevertheless experiencing as if they are perhaps not bringing social ills to their countries, which often have conservative views on gambling.

Regional Gambling Enterprises Also for Foreigners Just

This can be the full case in the Bahamas, where the country’s casinos are only open to site visitors from foreign nations. But such a move would be an unusual someone to apply to the planet of on line gambling, especially with the added provision that those tourists must come from jurisdictions that allow for on the web gambling.

A policy that is discriminatory this will significantly restrict the quantity of revenue such web sites could hope to generate. It seems hard to imagine that most tourists who look at the Bahamas is looking to spend their time on their computer systems or tablets playing blackjack or poker. Those who already prepared to gamble have the casinos that are live nightlife choices, while non-gamblers have plenty of other tourist options.

This can be why the measures built to keep locals out of the websites on the internet, combined with policy that is current keeps Bahamians out from the brick-and-mortar casinos, have been one of the most contentious in the battle over the nation’s video gaming industry. Several MPs have expressed concerns over any such policy that discriminates against Bahamians, and that was the bill that Rollins objected to before being taken out of their post.

At the brief moment, on the web gambling is entirely unlicensed into the Bahamas. Nevertheless, authorities rarely, if ever, enforce laws that are such a policy that has resulted in the increase of ‘web shops,’ which resemble Internet cafes in the US, that are frequently used by locals to access online gambling sites.

GBGA Legal Challenge to UK A tough sell, legal Experts Say

The Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association is fighting new tax that is UK, however their outlook is maybe not bright, experts say. (Image:

The Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association (GBGA) does have case up against the British government in its make an effort to legally challenge the new Gambling Act, nonetheless it may be ‘a bit thin,’ say some of the country’s top gaming lawyers. The GBGA filed its challenge last month in the British courts which it hopes will overturn brand new gaming legislation, legislation it claims is ‘unlawful, since it is an illegitimate, disproportionate and discriminatory interference utilizing the directly to free movement of services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU, and is irrational.’

During the heart of GBGA’s grievance is the UK government’s decision to introduce regulation and taxation at the point of usage, rather than the country of origin. Previously, the regulated gambling industry in the UK was comprised of operators that were controlled, licensed and taxed in a true wide range of jurisdictions across the world, including Gibraltar. These jurisdictions was indeed approved, or ‘white-listed’, by the government in Westminster underneath the 2005 Gambling Act. But, under the new rules, an operator desperate to engage with the highly lucrative UK market will have to hold a UK Gambling Commission license and spend the UK remote video gaming tax of 15 percent of gross profits, significantly higher than most of the white-listed jurisdictions.

No Real Argument for Restriction of Trade

GBGA argues that the work is a breach of European Law, specifically article 56 of this Treaty on the Functioning of europe (TFEU), which deals with all the directly to trade easily across edges.

‘All this Act achieves is a wholly unjustified, disproportionate and discriminatory disturbance with the right to free movement of services, a right enshrined in European Law,’ said Dan Tench, a partner at Olswang, which is representing the GBGA.

Jason Chess, the relative head of betting and gaming at Wiggin law firm, told Gaming Intelligence that the GBGA has a case contrary to the government. ‘You must have some sound reasons for limiting the motion of trade,’ he says. ‘Other countries are backing away from monopolies while we are reversing out of a completely free EU-compliant market.’

He tips to the very fact that as the protection of problem gamblers is one of the stated aims of the new legislation, problem gambling has paid off since the 2005 Gambling Act, which suggests that there is no reasonable argument for the limitation of trade in this case. He additionally says that since the great majority UK players utilize white-listed sites, there’s no pressing need to fight the market that is black.

But, says Chess, in contrast with every other point of consumption regime in Europe, the UK one looks completely reasonable. ‘ Your average Francophone European Court of Justice judge shall see this as a style of deregulated haven,’ he says.

No Killer Argument?

Julian Harris at Harris Hagan agrees: ‘There is a legal basis because of it but in all honesty, it’s really a bit slim,’ he claims. Once a legislation has been passed by parliament, which can be the court that is highest in the land, it could simply be challenged in Europe, he claims, incorporating that the European Court has currently looked over regulations and OK’d it.

GBGA’s only hope may be the European Court of Justice, although Harris claims this will be incredibly unlikely to happen. ‘I have always been perhaps not aware of any piece of legislation ever being struck down by any court,’ he says. ‘The ECJ could strike it down but it would fairly have to be flagrantly in breach of European law. And it is maybe not.’

‘I struggle to see the killer argument,’ stated another gaming attorney. ‘The federal government did its research. It went through the EC. Its not like the position that is german where the EC raised concerns immediately.’

However, regardless of the problems of the case, the GBGA still means business. The legal group it has recruited is formidable and it’s really estimated it may have spent £500,000 ($824,375) on the case already.