Contact Dulevo UK - TEL: 01924 820 876 |

Latest News From Dulevo

Former US Rep Mike Oxley Says Online Gambling Ban Would Be Misguided

Former <span id="more-8456"></span>US Rep Mike Oxley Says Online Gambling Ban Would Be Misguided

Previous US Representative Mike Oxley says there’s no turning back on Web video gaming, and that regulation is the response. (Image: AP/Lawrence Jackson)

Former Republican US Representative Mike Oxley has granted a warning that is stern the full-scale banning of on the web gambling in the US will be the ‘wrong policy’ and misguided, and so it would leave People in america exposed to the potential potential risks of using unregulated operators. Oxley who stated he examined the question of online gambling regulation in-depth a few years back as an element of his part as chairman of the House Financial Affairs Committee ended up being writing in their web log for Washington newspaper that is political Hill‘s website.

No Going Back over Time, Oxley Says

‘Congress cannot reverse time or dump the Internet,’ said Oxley. ‘ We need to be focused on keeping consumers, companies, and families safe whenever engaging in online activities. That means utilizing the best available technology and the best safeguards, not blocking their use… Prohibition … didn’t use liquor, also it won’t work with the online today.’

Oxley fears that Americans including children would be ‘less safe’ should Congress pass this kind of ban, and calls on the government to adopt an attitude that is realistic consumer behavior. Legislation he sees very much as the smaller of two evils because he believes it will enhance individual protection.

‘The real question isn’t whether or not Us citizens are participating in online video gaming. The consumer base is into the millions, and the revenue is in the billions on overseas markets that are black. The question is whether Congress banning all online gaming would make consumers more or less safe in the Internet…The risk of publicity to identification theft, fraud, even money laundering on an unsafe, unregulated, overseas black-market website is serious. And ignoring that black market, rather than addressing it, will just make us less safe.’

Regulation vs. Criminalization

Oxley had praise that is high the newly regulated states: Delaware, New Jersey and Nevada; specially the technology that they had applied to protect consumers.

‘These states are utilizing modern age-verification technology to prohibit minors from using gaming websites, and highly sophisticated geolocation technology to precisely figure out a potential player’s physical location and thereby prohibit out-of-state gaming in legal and regulated markets,’ penned Oxley. ‘These sophisticated technologies have proven effective in current regulated markets for online gaming and other commerce that is online. Congress shouldn’t step in and stop their use.’

As being a US Representative, Oxley was co-author associated with the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which brought in sweeping new legislation for big businesses within the wake of the Enron scandal. Before entering Congress, he was an FBI agent. He served in the Ohio House of Representatives from 1973 to 1981, and had been elected a US representative in 1981. Now retired, he is co-chair for the Coalition for Consumer and Online Protection (C4COP), an organization produced to counter, primarily, Las Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson’s virulent attack on Web gaming in any style. The organization additionally has the backing of the American Gaming Association the casino industry’s primary lobbying arm also numerous industry leaders.

Oxley drew on their experiences in the FBI to warn that prohibition would fail to stem the tide of ‘black market’ sites, which, he says, are frequently run by individuals ‘the Justice Department says are engaged in serious criminal task.’

Florida Tries to Unban Arcades, Discovers New Gambling Law Problems

Popular youngsters’ arcades like this Chuck E. Cheese have gotten caught in Florida’s ambiguous gambling regulations.

If you are unsure whether Florida’s gambling laws require a complete overhaul, then take a look at the way they affect Chuck E. Cheese. That is right: the popular pizza and arcade location was an unintended target last year whenever legislators outlawed online sweepstakes cafes throughout the state, accidentally banning some regular arcades into the process. Now the state is seeking to rectify that mistake, but is finding that the regulations that are new cause yet more loopholes in Florida’s patchwork system of confusing gambling regulations.

Keeping Family Arcades Secure

A bill that would make sure that coinless arcades like Dave & Busters or Chuck E. Cheese are excluded from the legal internet was supported unanimously by the Senate Gaming Committee last week, paving the means for what the law states to be voted on by the legislature that is full. The bill PCB 668 would ensure that family amusement facilities would be excluded from the regulations that outlawed the ‘Internet cafes’ which were little more than fronts for sweepstakes games.

Regional authorities were asked to not enforce the law against the arcades, and now the brand new bill introduced by State Senator Kelli Stargel (R-Lakeland) appears like it could remedy the issue. But some fear that the regulations that are new simply cause more dilemmas for Florida’s gambling regulators.

Gaming law expert Marc Dunbar testified that opening any loopholes for enjoyment facilities will encourage gambling operators to attempt to look for a method to exploit those loopholes in order to operate some form legally of video gaming.

‘ The grey market industry is very vibrant in Florida because we would not have a regulator along with our gaming code,’ Dunbar said.

The bill that is new revise the definitions used to declare machines as ‘amusements games.’ These games which may be allowed in arcades, bowling alleys, hotels, restaurants, and truck stops can now utilize tokens, cards or other products to power them along with coins. They may now provide prizes as high as $5.25 per game (up from $0.75 beneath the old legislation), and can give away awards valued at just as much as $50 to players.

‘Our target wasn’t family arcades,’ stated Senator Stargel, while also pointing out that just true family establishments would qualify underneath the law that is new. ‘These amusement facilities need to continue to provide entertainment for kids and adults.’

Clawing the Law

Dunbar, who’s got been used several times as an expert on gaming issues by Florida legislators, had other issues in regards to the bill since well. For example, he pointed out that the new legislation would enable venues to operate ‘claw machines’ the games where players operate a mini-crane and try to choose up prizes. Dunbar said that the government that is federal these machines as gambling devices, which could break their state compact utilizing the Seminole Tribe, worth billions to the state over the life associated with the compact.

Some senators also asked how the bill would affect alleged senior arcades.

‘ How about those kids being 80, 85, and 90?’ asked Senator Maria Sachs. ‘ So this would bring back the activation of some of the arcades that were[located or stand-alone in] strip shopping malls we’d in my region?’

In accordance with Stargel, such venues could reopen, offered they observed the rules set forth in the bill.

New Hampshire House Defeats Casino Gambling Bill

Brand New Hampshire Governor Maggie Hassan seen here in might of last year was a supporter of the defeated casino bill (Image: ALEXANDER COHN / Concord Monitor)

Regarding casino gambling, the house always wins. But in some full cases, that doesn’t necessarily refer towards the casino itself. New Hampshire’s home of Representatives voted down a bill that would have allowed the state to license a casino that is single the state, continuing a tradition of this House voting down casino proposals into the Granite State.

The vote, which came on Thursday, was one that promised to own a closer outcome than previous bills regarding the subject. The regulations that would were put into destination might have been more substantial than in a bill that is similar year, while the limits regarding the size regarding the casino up to 5,000 slots and 150 table games would were almost the same. However in the end, the anti-casino forces won down by a margin that is comfortable of.

Governor Supported Gambling Bill

That had been a defeat for Governor Maggie Hassan, that has backed the casino bill. Supporters associated with the bill had argued that now had been the time to add casino gambling to the state, as they stood to lose away on a great amount of revenue when neighboring Massachusetts began starting casinos into the future that is not-too-distant.

Those opposed pointed to the long-standing traditions of New Hampshire, which had never encompassed casino gambling. They worried in regards to the social costs of expanded gambling, and said that there are better how to raise revenues than adding a casino, that could change the image of the state. That last problem was a particularly contentious one: some said that the state’s image as a cozy, quiet resort center complete of intimate bed-and-breakfasts might be sullied with the addition of a significant casino, while advocates for the casino pointed out that other states had successfully added land video gaming without making it the facial skin of their state per se.

According to lawmakers and only the casino, the annual revenues from the venue could have been as high as $105 million significant for a tiny state. They suggested integrating the casino in to the state’s current reputation being a tourist destination.

‘This is another draw to our state,’ argued Representative Frank Sapareto.

Casino Loses to Antagonists

But in the final end, the anti-casino votes won out. In specific, many feared that adding a massive bank of slot devices could generate a lot of problem gamblers, pointing out that those games had been the ones most associated with gambling addiction.

‘What is it us anti-casino types have against gambling enterprises? It is the slot devices,’ said Representative Patricia Lovejoy.

While the vote may not have gone her method, Governor Hassan proceeded to argue and only a future casino for the continuing state, hoping that sooner or later lawmakers may find a solution that worked for everybody.

‘ Despite today’s vote, I continue to believe that developing our own plan for one high-end casino is the course that is best of action for investing in the priorities that are critical to long-term financial growth,’ Hassan said in a statement. ‘Soon, we all will see the impact of Massachusetts casinos right across our border in the type of lost revenue and prospective social costs.’

There clearly was a Senate casino bill that passed earlier this that could still be sent to the House for a vote, but the odds of it passing the House are slim year. The two legislative figures have disagreed on how to finance costs, such as for an expansion of Interstate 93: while the House passed a fuel goverment tax bill year that is last the Senate rejected the measure, while the opposite was real of casino proposals.