Contact Dulevo UK - TEL: 01924 820 876 |

Latest News From Dulevo

West Virginia Rules DFS Game of Skill; No it’s Perhaps Not, Says Delaware

West Vi<span id="more-9808"></span>rginia Rules DFS Game of Skill; No it’s Perhaps Not, Says Delaware

Delaware AG Matthew Denn’s opinion it is DFS is just a not a game of skill. At the least, it’s not the real means we play it!

West Virginia and Delaware are two states that have no plans to legalize daily fantasy recreations in the near future, and for two completely different reasons. Two attorneys basic, 400 miles apart, have actually demonstrated two very different opinions on the legality of the contests over days gone by days that are few.

On Monday, western Virginia’s AG ruled that there was you don’t need to legalize DFS since it had been prominently a casino game of skill and therefore perfectly legal under West Virginia law.

‘We read state law to prohibit only betting upon games decided at least predominantly by chance,’ had written Morrisey in his opinion. But DFS, he said ‘are determined predominantly by skill, knowledge, and athletic performance.’

A matter for the legislature whether West Virginia will now move to regulate and tax the DFS industry, as its neighbor Virginia became the first US state to do at the beginning of the year, is of course.

Delaware Pulls the Plug

In stark contrast, Delaware pulled the plug on DFS the other day, with its AG, Matthew Denn, ruling, perhaps more controversially, that the contests had been pretty much games of chance.

‘Relying in the Delaware Constitution, as well as State and Federal case legislation, DOJ attorneys determined that online fantasy contests that incorporate payment for playing and financial rewards constitute gambling because possibility, as opposed to experience, is the dominant factor in the end result of these contests,’ said Denn.

‘The most participants that are skilled lose much less skilled participants might win because of exactly what actually occurs during the real-life game. In other terms, real-life players are human being and behavior that is human unpredictable.

‘While it is acknowledged that particular individuals may use their respective recreations knowledge in selecting their fantasy players and otherwise participating such contests, that factor alone does not result in the contests games of ability.’

Precursor to Regulation?

Denn said that he’d written cease and desist letters to DFS sites running in Delaware, including DraftKings, FanDuel and Yahoo. There has been no formal statement from any operator on the matter, nor any indication of whether they intend to comply.

Needless to say, the AG’s ruling would not preclude the legislature from passing a law to legalize and regulate DFS in the future; certainly, similar rulings from DA’s in other states have shown become a catalyst for the passing such legislation, as had been the case in Tennessee and Mississippi earlier this year.

A bill to control DFS was introduced into the Delaware home at zero hour at the finish of the session that is legislative 30 June, but could was far too late be pushed through.

‘we have been sure that numerous Delaware residents and visitors would enjoy participating into the array that is full of activities contests, including those who require payment for participation and have cash honors,’ concluded Genn. ‘But until such contests can legally be offered, the DOJ must enforce the law.’

RAWA Champion Chaffetz Grills AG Lynch, While Sanders Shocks with Clinton Endorsement

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was back at it on Capitol Hill this week, as the congressman continues to need answers concerning the FBI’s suggestion to your Department of Justice (DOJ) not to prosecute Democratic contender that is presidential Clinton.

On July 6, FBI Director James Comey stated Clinton’s use of a private email server while serving as secretary of state was careless, but did not warrant criminal fees.

US Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) seen here at an earlier hearing because of the FBI’s James Comey, grilled AG Loretta Lynch at a House Judiciary Commitee hearing on Tuesday in regards to the legalities surrounding Hillary Clinton’s claims about her email server that is private usage. Lynch largely avoided taking any stance whatsoever, visibly irritating Chaffetz. Representative Elijah Cummings (D- Maryland) sits to Chaffetz’ right. (Image: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Chaffetz is Las Vegas Sands Chairman Sheldon Adelson’s right-hand man in Congress. The representative introduced the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in the homely house to coincide with Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-South Carolina) legislation in the Senate.

RAWA seeks to restore the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Five years ago, the DOJ issued a viewpoint saying the Wire Act applied just to online sports wagering, efficiently opening states to legalize Internet casinos.

Chaffetz believes the DOJ had no right to unilaterally overhaul federal law. He also doesn’t believe the department is being candid in how it’s responding to Comey’s findings.

Pleading the Fifth

The morning after their agency recommended no charges against Clinton for storing classified emails on non-secure servers, Comey met with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, of which Chaffetz is the chairman.

Although he didn’t have the true luxury of as much interview time as he did with Comey, Chaffetz did their best to take complete advantage of the five minutes he’d with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday. As AG, Lynch is technically Comey’s boss, once the FBI is just a division regarding the DOJ.

But Lynch deflected one question after another, much towards the chagrin of the Utah congressman. The AG avoided giving specific answers to Chaffetz’ ongoing assault of ‘can it be legal or unlawful?’

‘ Is it legal or illegal to fairly share classified information with somebody would youn’t have a security approval?’ the congressman asked Lynch. ‘Is it legal or illegal to produce access to somebody who doesn’t always have the requisite security clearance to view categorized material? Could it be appropriate or illegal to store, house, or retain classified information in a non-secure location?’

When Lynch regularly and repeatedly referred him to ‘statutes’ to clarify the legal standing on some of these issues, Chaffetz’ frustration was abundant and unhidden.

‘The shortage of quality you share with this body is pretty that is stunnin . . My time has expired, I wish we had about 20 more minutes,’ he noted.

Sanders Endorses Clinton

With all the email scandal ( at the very least lawfully) behind her, Hillary Clinton has now gotten the formal nod from her former nemesis in Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

‘Secretary Clinton has won the Democratic nomination,’ Sanders said in New Hampshire, standing alongside the former secretary of state and First Lady. ‘I mean to do everything I will to make certain she could be the president that is next of United States.’

Republican nominee Donald Trump countered the announcement by straight away releasing an advertising highlighting the various times Sanders said Clinton ended up being unfit become president.

Bush and Obama Unite, for One Brief Shining Minute

Meanwhile, a moment that is rare of between the governmental parties emerged on July 12 in Dallas. During a memorial service for the slain police officers ambushed on July 7, President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush came together so that they can honor those killed with a crazed anti-law, anti-white gunman in a sniper attack

Obama told mourners, ‘As Americans, we could decide that people like this killer will fail ultimately. They shall not drive us apart. We can choose to come together and make our country reflect the nice inside us, the hopes and simple dreams we share.’

Before Obama, Bush talked about the selflessness of police officers everywhere.

‘Most of us that is amazing if the moment called we would risk our lives to protect a spouse or a child,’ the former president said for it. ‘Those wearing the assume that is uniform risk for the safety of strangers [at all times].’

Further feedback about gun control as well as the Black Lives question movement through the service from Obama received critique from some segments, however, with numerous saying it was not the place that is right time for you to address politically loaded issues.

Pennsylvania Online Gambling Bill Shelved Until Legislature Reconvenes This Autumn

Billionaire and gambling that is anti-Internet Sheldon Adelson is likely happy to learn Pennsylvania online gambling is being delayed until at least the fall. (Image: Associated Press/

Pennsylvania on line gambling will be pushed aside in Harrisburg until the autumn. That’s the unfortunate outcome for iGambling proponents after lawmakers in the Keystone State labored over gambling expansion legislation for the final several months.

At 12:01 am on July 12, Governor Tom Wolf (D) allowed a bipartisan budget plan to become law without his signature. The $31.5 billion spending blueprint will increase spending on education and provide resources to combat hawaii’s heroin epidemic.

The issue that is primary how to shell out the dough. Based on who’s counting, the appropriations bill creates a $1-2 billion shortfall.

Mainly pushed by Republicans into the General Assembly, gambling expansion was seen as one ideal untapped resource that may help pay for the master plan. But the legislature is anticipated to adjourn for the summer and not sometime reconvene until this fall.

Gambling on Hold

Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the gambling expansion under consideration could have authorized off-track betting facilities and airports to house slot machines, regulate fantasy that is daily (DFS), and legalize online gambling.

Present land-based casinos would function as only ones permitted to provide online gambling. Licenses were expected to price operators $8 million, with gross gaming revenues taxed at 16 percent.

‘Regulating and taxing interactive video gaming in Pennsylvania is just a viable option that will benefit the state and our communities,’ Payne said in belated June. ‘we must consider revolutionary income sources to fill our budget shortfall and keep our public pension system solvent. before we ask the taxpayers to fork over more of these hard-earned cash,’

Gambling certainly won’t overcome the billion-dollar space, however it would help.

Lawmakers estimate $100 million is created for Harrisburg in the year that is first mainly due to upfront certification fees. Which means five to 10 percent of the budget space could possibly be solved through gambling expansion.

State leaders are also targeting an additional $1 tax on each pack of cigarettes sold, imposing a six percent taxation on digital entertainment downloads, and overhauling the state-run wine industry to allow private merchants to enter the market.

Spend Now, Spend Later

Anyone with a charge card knows essential it’s to cover on time. Unfortunately for residents in Pennsylvania, their leaders that are electedn’t as economically versed.

State Sen. Pat Browne (R-District 16), president of their state’s Senate Appropriations Committee, says action shall be forthcoming.

‘One hundred million dollars into the scope of a $31.5 billion budget . . . it’s not required right away,’ Browne told the Philadelphia Inquirer. The Lehigh County senator added, however, that the odds of online gambling being reconsidered this fall are ‘probable.’

Wolf was justly upset that the General Assembly didn’t send him a calculated method to pay because of its budget.

‘The General Assembly has a responsibility that is constitutional pass a sustainable revenue package to purchase what they desire to invest,’ Wolf said this week. ‘We owe it to taxpayers, our youngsters, seniors, and our most susceptible to bring this across the finish line.’

Quebec ISP Blocking Challenged by Federal Customer Rights Group

Quebec’s plan to block online gambling web site faces a challenge that it’s in direct conflict with federal law. (Image:

Quebec’s intends to force ISP’s to block access to unlicensed gambling is being put to the test by a federal customer rights group. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) this week filed an objection up to a legislation, passed by the Quebec legislature earlier in the year, which aims to disconnect 8.2 million residents through the markets that are unregulated.

The bill’s supporters declare that its aim is to ‘improve general public wellness’ by forcing state residents to play on Quebec’s sole regulated online gaming web site, Lotto-Quebec’s Espace-jeux.

But critics, which include net neutrality advocates, technology solicitors, and the ISPs themselves, have accused the Quebec government of setting a precedent that is dangerous putting commercial gain above the freedom associated with internet. The plans, that have been used within the provinces March 2015 budget predict the scheme will boost federal government revenues by $13.5 million in 2016-2017 and $27 million in subsequent years.

Price to Consumers

These gains will come at the huge expense of ISP companies, which may have said that the interruption to their infrastructures is enormous as they could have to redesign their companies from the ground up. The price of this would be passed onto consumers.

The PIAC filing states that Quebec is in direct conflict with the1993 Federal Telecommunications Act, which prohibits a communications provider from ‘control[ing] the content or influence[ing] the meaning or reason for telecommunications carried by it for the public,’ unless it’s approval from the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.